Requests for suspension of payment from SARS

Since its introduction, the “pay now, argue later” rule relating to disputed amounts of tax has been and remains to be the subject of much controversy, and rightfully so. The basic premise is that even though you disagree with an amount of tax, once you have been assessed by SARS, the amount becomes due and your obligation to pay the tax, and SARS’ right to recover the tax, is not suspended by any objections or appeals against the assessment or pending court proceedings (i.e. pay the tax, and then dispute it).

Taxpayers do however have some remedy, in that they may request a senior SARS official to suspend the payment of the tax (or a portion), pending the outcome of a dispute against an assessment. Importantly, a taxpayer needs to dispute, or at least intend to dispute, the amount of tax allegedly due before a request to suspend the payment can be made.

In considering the request, the SARS official should consider relevant factors, including:

  • whether the recovery of the disputed tax will be in jeopardy or if there will be a risk of dissipation of assets;
  • the compliance history of the taxpayer with SARS;
  • whether fraud is prima facie involved in the origin of the dispute;
  • whether the taxpayer has tendered adequate security for the payment of the disputed tax and if accepting it is in the interest of SARS or the fiscus; and
  • whether payment will result in irreparable hardship to the taxpayer not justified by the prejudice to SARS or the fiscus if the disputed tax is not paid or recovered.

Taxpayers should not look to abuse the suspension system, as SARS are well within their rights to revoke a decision to suspend payment with immediate effect, if it is satisfied that a taxpayer merely entered into the dispute process on a frivolous or vexatious basis, is employing dilatory tactics, or if there is a material change in the circumstances from when the request was granted. Furthermore, if a request has been successfully granted, but the taxpayer does not object to the assessment, does not appeal after a disallowed objection or proceeds to court, the suspension is revoked with immediate effect.

SARS will not suspend payment of an amount of tax out of own accord once the dispute process has commenced. Taxpayers will need to actively take steps to initiate the suspension, through either e-filing or a branch office visit. A request for suspension of payment is a vital part of the dispute resolution process and should be submitted as soon as possible for an assessment which a taxpayer intends to dispute. If not already along with a request for reasons, it would be good practice to submit the request at the same time as the objection.

This article is a general information sheet and should not be used or relied upon as professional advice. No liability can be accepted for any errors or omissions nor for any loss or damage arising from reliance upon any information herein. Always contact your financial adviser for specific and detailed advice. Errors and omissions excepted (E&OE)



, ,


We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By continuing to browse, you agree to our use of cookies

IC Marais

Professional experience:

IC Marais is a certified CA (SA) with public sector and private sector technical knowledge based on 5 years’ Public Sector accounting, auditing and financial management experience and 5 years audit, tax and accounting experience. Detailed knowledge of private and public sector accounting and auditing standards (GRAP, IPSAS, IFRS, IAS, ISA) and public sector financial legislation (MFMA, etc.)

He enjoys the outdoors, hunting and fishing.


Professional experience:

In 1995, Schalk started as a trainee at Warner and Newton (which became Moores Rowland in 1997 and then Mazars Moores Rowland in 2007) in Bloemfontein. In 1998, Schalk was appointed as manager at Moores Rowland, where he became a partner in 2003. Schalk received his Postgraduate Certificate in Advanced Taxation in 2006 and in 2009 he received his Certificate in the Administration of Estates.


Professional experience:

Cedric started as a trainee at Warner and Newton (which became Moores Rowland in 1997 and Mazars Moores Rowland in 2007), Bloemfontein, in 1986. After completion of his articles, he joined the Special Investigations Division of the Department of Finance (SA Revenue Services) as a senior inspector from 1990 to 1991.


Professional experience:

Lucha started her career as a tax inspector at the Inland Revenue Department of New Zealand. After this she worked in commerce in Canada, Mexico and the United States.

On her return to South Africa, she completed her CA training contract with us and has been with Newtons ever since. She became a Partner in 2012.

Apart from her CA(SA) qualification she also holds a postgraduate certificate in Advanced Taxation (2005) and has the overall responsibility for training as our Training Officer.